MSL & digital engagement
The high-value MSL moments, the digital cadences HCPs find acceptable (mean acceptability 1–5), and how it differs by setting and research activity.
When MSL discussions add most value (overall)
- After reviewing relevant data independently, to clarify questions ?or uncertainties30%i100
- To discuss upcoming pipeline developments22%i100
- To discuss complex treatment sequencing or decision-making20%i100
- As a follow-up after I requested medical info19%i100
- As a first introduction to new clinical or trial data17%i100
- To explore safety, tolerability, or real-world experience in more depth16%i100
- To explore how new data applies to specific patient types in my practice15%i100
- I do not typically find 1:1 discussions with pharmaceutical company representatives necessary13%i100
- To discuss clinical trial opportunities or research collaboration13%i100
Digital cadence acceptability (mean 1–7, whole sample)
- Meaningful change updated only – Receiving updates only when there is practice changing evidence or a meaningful change to guidelines or standard of care5.88 / 7
- Around major congresses only – Receiving updates only around major scientific congresses (pre- and post-congress), with minimal communication outside those periods5.25 / 7
- Ad hoc – Receiving occasional ad hoc updates only when a new data release is highly relevant5.25 / 7
- Monthly roundup – Receiving one monthly update summarizing all data relevant to my specialty4.59 / 7
- Quarterly summary – Receiving a quarterly summary of the most important updates relevant to my specialty4.49 / 7
- I generally prefer not to receive digital updates and instead access information independently when needed3.09 / 7
Acceptability of digital approaches (mean 1–7)
Whole sample
Academic
Community
MSL value by setting
Community
- After reviewing relevant data independently, to clarify questions ?or uncertainties27%i91
- To discuss upcoming pipeline developments21%i93
- To discuss complex treatment sequencing or decision-making19%i95
- As a follow-up after I requested medical info19%i96
- As a first introduction to new clinical or trial data18%i106
- To explore safety, tolerability, or real-world experience in more depth17%i102
- To explore how new data applies to specific patient types in my practice15%i105
- I do not typically find 1:1 discussions with pharmaceutical company representatives necessary15%i111
Academic
- After reviewing relevant data independently, to clarify questions ?or uncertainties33%i111
- To discuss upcoming pipeline developments24%i108
- To discuss complex treatment sequencing or decision-making22%i107
- As a follow-up after I requested medical info20%i105
- To discuss clinical trial opportunities or research collaboration17%i126
- As a first introduction to new clinical or trial data16%i95
- To explore safety, tolerability, or real-world experience in more depth16%i98
- To explore how new data applies to specific patient types in my practice14%i95
Digital cadence acceptability - by research activity
Research-active
- Meaningful change updated only – Receiving updates only when there is practice changing evidence or a meaningful change to guidelines or standard of care5.85 / 7
- Around major congresses only – Receiving updates only around major scientific congresses (pre- and post-congress), with minimal communication outside those periods5.26 / 7
- Ad hoc – Receiving occasional ad hoc updates only when a new data release is highly relevant5.22 / 7
- Monthly roundup – Receiving one monthly update summarizing all data relevant to my specialty4.52 / 7
- Quarterly summary – Receiving a quarterly summary of the most important updates relevant to my specialty4.49 / 7
- I generally prefer not to receive digital updates and instead access information independently when needed3.26 / 7
Not research-active
- Meaningful change updated only – Receiving updates only when there is practice changing evidence or a meaningful change to guidelines or standard of care5.86 / 7
- Around major congresses only – Receiving updates only around major scientific congresses (pre- and post-congress), with minimal communication outside those periods5.33 / 7
- Ad hoc – Receiving occasional ad hoc updates only when a new data release is highly relevant5.26 / 7
- Monthly roundup – Receiving one monthly update summarizing all data relevant to my specialty4.72 / 7
- Quarterly summary – Receiving a quarterly summary of the most important updates relevant to my specialty4.60 / 7
- I generally prefer not to receive digital updates and instead access information independently when needed2.94 / 7